THESIS
2017
xxv, 273 pages : illustrations ; 30 cm
Abstract
Vegetation reduces pore-water pressure in soil by root water uptake. The reduction of pore-water
pressure results in higher shear strength but lower water permeability of soil, affecting
slope stability in vegetated slope and water percolation in landfill cover. Effects of different
root architectures on root water uptake and hence pore-water pressure responses are not well
understood. The principle objective of this research is to investigate the effects of root
architectures on pore-water pressure distributions and slope stability.
Analytical and experimental studies were carried out to investigate the effects of root
architecture on pore-water pressure response. Analytical solutions of pore-water pressure
distributions in single and multi-layer vegetated slopes were derived c...[
Read more ]
Vegetation reduces pore-water pressure in soil by root water uptake. The reduction of pore-water
pressure results in higher shear strength but lower water permeability of soil, affecting
slope stability in vegetated slope and water percolation in landfill cover. Effects of different
root architectures on root water uptake and hence pore-water pressure responses are not well
understood. The principle objective of this research is to investigate the effects of root
architectures on pore-water pressure distributions and slope stability.
Analytical and experimental studies were carried out to investigate the effects of root
architecture on pore-water pressure response. Analytical solutions of pore-water pressure
distributions in single and multi-layer vegetated slopes were derived considering different root
architectures, namely the uniform, triangular, exponential and parabolic roots. Then soil
column tests were conducted to investigate effects of root characteristics of two grass types
(Bermuda grass and vetiver) on pore-water pressure distributions in the three-layer landfill
cover. The measurements were used to verify the analytical solutions. Moreover, dimensional
analysis was conducted to investigate the governing parameters of pore-water pressure
distributions in vegetated slope. Finally, a series of analytical studies were performed to
investigate the effects of root architecture on pore-water pressure distributions and slope
stability.
Measurements from soil column tests show that vetiver has larger ability to reduce pore-water
pressure than Bermuda grass due to larger root area and longer root depth. Hence vetiver
is more effective than Bermuda grass in preventing water infiltration.
Parametric studies show that exponential root architecture induces the highest negative pore-water
pressure in the soil, followed by the triangular, uniform and parabolic roots. Exponential
and triangular root architectures show similar behaviour on pore-water pressure distributions,
while uniform and parabolic give almost the same results. Exponential root architecture has
higher ability to maintain slope stability than parabolic one. Under light rainfall (i.e, 20 mm/day)
for 24 hours, the hydrological effects of vegetation are more important inside root zone than
outside root zone, while it is opposite for rainfall intensities of 181 mm/day and 394 mm/day
over the same duration. The hydrological effects of vegetation are more pronounced outside
root zone, when subjected to prolonged rainfall.
For a specific root architecture, three dimensionless numbers controlling pore-water pressure
distributions in vegetated slope were proposed, including capillary effect number (CN;
describing the relative importance of water flow driven by pore-water pressure gradient), root
water uptake number (RN; representing effects of root water uptake) and water transfer-storage
ratio (WR; representing the importance of water flow compared with water storage rate).
During drying period, effects of root water uptake and root architecture on pore-water pressure
distributions and the influence zone become more significant as CN and RN increases. During
wetting period with the same initial conditions, the larger the WR, the deeper the wetting front
and more reduction of negative pore-water pressure.
Post a Comment