THESIS
2018
xii, 80 pages : illustrations ; 30 cm
Abstract
Knowledge sharing is an activity through which information, skills, or expertise is disseminated,
reconstructed, and internalized among people, friends, families, communities or organizations.
It is an indispensable element of the booming sharing economy and e-commerce where interactions
between individuals are unprecedentedly intensive.
To coordinate and promote knowledge sharing, it is important to investigate the fundamental
aspects appertaining to this activity, including motivations for sharing knowledge, the optimal
format of information delivery (i.e., what information and how much to provide to which recipients),
the efficiency of sharing, intended recipients, and learning processes. Among these
aspects, my thesis mainly focuses on two areas namely, motivations for knowl...[
Read more ]
Knowledge sharing is an activity through which information, skills, or expertise is disseminated,
reconstructed, and internalized among people, friends, families, communities or organizations.
It is an indispensable element of the booming sharing economy and e-commerce where interactions
between individuals are unprecedentedly intensive.
To coordinate and promote knowledge sharing, it is important to investigate the fundamental
aspects appertaining to this activity, including motivations for sharing knowledge, the optimal
format of information delivery (i.e., what information and how much to provide to which recipients),
the efficiency of sharing, intended recipients, and learning processes. Among these
aspects, my thesis mainly focuses on two areas namely, motivations for knowledge sharing, and
optimal information provision format.
In the first part, we investigate the knowledge sharing motivations among competing smallholders.
In developing economies, smallholders apply their own specialized knowledge as
well as exert costly effort in managing their farms. To raise overall productivity, NGOs and
governments are advocating various knowledge sharing and learning platforms so that farmers
can exchange a variety of farming techniques. Putting altruism aside, we examine the overall
economic implications for heterogeneous farmers to share their private knowledge voluntarily
with others under (implicit) competition. By analyzing a multi-person sequential game, we provide
a plausible reason to explain why (and conditions under which) knowledge sharing can be
beneficial even when each farmer’s profit depends on the total output. We find that the voluntary
shared level is always lower than or equal to the “efficient” shared level which maximizes
farmer welfare under coordination. This finding is motivational in developing a reward mechanism
to entice farmers to elevate their knowledge shared level in a decentralized system so as
to maximize farmer welfare. Upon reviewing different mechanisms, we establish a quota-based
reward mechanism that can entice farmers to share knowledge voluntarily up to the efficient
shared level.
In the second part, we examine the impact of information provision policy on a firm’s profitability.
Companies often post user-generated reviews online to facilitate social learning, so that
consumers can learn from existing customers about the quality of an experience good before
purchasing. We evaluate two potential user-generated review provision policies for a company
that sells an experience good in two heterogeneous regions over two periods. The first policy is
called the Association-based policy under which a consumer who belongs to a region can only
observe the aggregate review (i.e., average rating) generated by customers from the same region.
The second one is called the Global-based policy under which each consumer is presented with
the aggregate review generated by all of the users in both regions. We find that, regardless of
the provision format, posting customer-generated reviews is beneficial to the firm. Also, we
demonstrate that the Global-based policy dominates the Association-based policy when (a) the
product quality is highly uncertain; or (b) the two regions are fairly similar (in terms of variability
in the product ratings). Moreover, we propose a third more beneficial provision policy
that imparts more product information to consumers than either the Association-based or the
Global-based policy alone.
Post a Comment