To improve the accuracy of air quality prediction, a refined emission inventory for Guangdong Province and updated model-ready emissions for regions outside GD have been integrated into the comprehensive air quality modelling system (WRF-SMOKE-CMAQ).
Annual emissions of SO
2, NOx, VOC, PM
2.5, PM
10, and NH
3 in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, as well as pollutant contributions in 2015 and 2017, base years of previous and updated emission inventory, have been analyzed. Statics reveal that SO
2, PM
2.5, PM
10, VOC and NH
3 emissions have a reduction over PRD, while NOx has an increase (14.4%). Non-road mobile sources become the largest contributor to SO
2 and NOx in 2017, instead of stationary combustion in 2015. Industrial processes and dust remain the largest contributor to PM
2.5 and PM
10,...[
Read more ]
To improve the accuracy of air quality prediction, a refined emission inventory for Guangdong Province and updated model-ready emissions for regions outside GD have been integrated into the comprehensive air quality modelling system (WRF-SMOKE-CMAQ).
Annual emissions of SO
2, NOx, VOC, PM
2.5, PM
10, and NH
3 in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, as well as pollutant contributions in 2015 and 2017, base years of previous and updated emission inventory, have been analyzed. Statics reveal that SO
2, PM
2.5, PM
10, VOC and NH
3 emissions have a reduction over PRD, while NOx has an increase (14.4%). Non-road mobile sources become the largest contributor to SO
2 and NOx in 2017, instead of stationary combustion in 2015. Industrial processes and dust remain the largest contributor to PM
2.5 and PM
10, respectively. Same as VOC and NH
3, which are dominated by one primary source in both two years, solvent use and agriculture, respectively.
Emission inventories and air quality model-ready emissions have been updated from a base year on 2015 to 2017 for all datasets. Four representative months, January, April, July, and October in 2019, have been selected to run with two case scenarios: one using previous emission settings (2015 EI for PRD, 2015 MEIC for non-PRD and 2015 MEIC for outside GD) and the other one using refined emissions (2017 EI for PRD, 2017 EI for non-PRD and 2017 MEIC for outside GD).
Model performance of SO
2, NO
2, O
3, PM
2.5, and PM
10 in January, April, July, and October 2019 has then been evaluated. SO
2 and NO
2 have shown significant improvements when using refined emission inventory over GD, especially in removing extremely high peaks. However, O
3, PM
2.5, and PM
10 performance are relatively not good. R of O
3 increases over non-PRD, but increases in RMSE, NME of O
3, PM
2.5, and PM
10 indicates deviations are larger between new simulation and observation. PM
2.5 and PM
10 have been underpredicted over 30%, while ozone is overestimated over 20%. For HK, though its emission inventory has not been modified, pollutant patterns are affected by the regional impact. The changes for each pollutant are the same as it in PRD. Though the loss of PM meets the uncertainty range of raw EI (-43% for PM
2.5 and -45% for PM
10), further adjustments need to be made based on the uncertainty of each emission source.
Post a Comment