THESIS
2013
iii leaves, iv-xv, 154 pages : illustrations ; 30 cm
Abstract
The G
2/M DNA damage checkpoint plays an important role in the maintenance of
genome stability. It tightly controls the cell cycle machinery, and its deregulation may
lead to cancer. Upon DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation or other DNA
damaging agents, the checkpoint is activated through phosphorylation of ATR/ATM and
CHK1/CHK2, thereby preventing cells from entering mitosis. After DNA damage is
repaired, the checkpoint is turned off to allow progression into mitosis. As the detailed
mechanism of checkpoint recovery is largely unknown, the aim of this study is to
discover some of the components of this process. UCN-01, a CHK1 inhibitor, was used
to inactivate the checkpoint after DNA damage, thereby mimicking checkpoint recovery.
Whether this process is affected after indi...[
Read more ]
The G
2/M DNA damage checkpoint plays an important role in the maintenance of
genome stability. It tightly controls the cell cycle machinery, and its deregulation may
lead to cancer. Upon DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation or other DNA
damaging agents, the checkpoint is activated through phosphorylation of ATR/ATM and
CHK1/CHK2, thereby preventing cells from entering mitosis. After DNA damage is
repaired, the checkpoint is turned off to allow progression into mitosis. As the detailed
mechanism of checkpoint recovery is largely unknown, the aim of this study is to
discover some of the components of this process. UCN-01, a CHK1 inhibitor, was used
to inactivate the checkpoint after DNA damage, thereby mimicking checkpoint recovery.
Whether this process is affected after individual proteins were downregulated by RNA
interference was evaluated using time-lapse microscopy. As known players that
participate in cell cycle control may be involved in checkpoint recovery, I evaluated the
functions of 19 kinases, 14 phosphatases and 21 proteins involved in regulation of
mitotic spindles in this process. Among all the 54 candidates, knockdown of 14 proteins
affected checkpoint recovery, and the roles of CDC14A and Greatwall were confirmed
with other checkpoint abrogating agents. I also discovered that CDC14A and TBK1 were
required for DNA damage checkpoint maintenance. By combining results from this study
and other data from our group, we found that Greatwall may be involved in maintaining
genome stability by multiple mechanisms. Further investigations demonstrated that
Greatwall protected genome stability through both controlling checkpoint recovery and
preventing genome reduplication after DNA damage. These findings provided a better
understanding of DNA damage checkpoint recovery mechanism and new insights into
novel anticancer therapeutic targets.
Post a Comment