THESIS
2017
xviii, 206 pages : illustrations (some color) ; 30 cm
Abstract
Multiple barriers are commonly installed along predicted flow paths to intercept large
volumes of geophysical flows. Current practice ignores the impact and overflow dynamics
between multiple barriers and leads to an overly conservative design by using prescriptive
approaches. There is certainly a need to develop a scientific framework and
recommendations by investigating the flow dynamics during interaction with multiple barriers.
In this study, a series of physical tests were carried out using a 5-m long flume to understand
the mechanisms of interaction between two rigid barriers in series, using dry sand flow. The
physical test data was used to calibrate a three-dimensional finite-element model and to
back-analyse the flume test results. A numerical parametric study was also...[
Read more ]
Multiple barriers are commonly installed along predicted flow paths to intercept large
volumes of geophysical flows. Current practice ignores the impact and overflow dynamics
between multiple barriers and leads to an overly conservative design by using prescriptive
approaches. There is certainly a need to develop a scientific framework and
recommendations by investigating the flow dynamics during interaction with multiple barriers.
In this study, a series of physical tests were carried out using a 5-m long flume to understand
the mechanisms of interaction between two rigid barriers in series, using dry sand flow. The
physical test data was used to calibrate a three-dimensional finite-element model and to
back-analyse the flume test results. A numerical parametric study was also carried out to
investigate the effects of upstream barrier height and barrier spacing on downstream impact
characteristics.
This study reveals that there are two key interaction mechanisms that should be considered in the design of multiple-barrier systems: (i) runup at the upstream barrier, in which flow
momentum changes direction from towards the barrier to parallel to it, which reduces
overflow momentum at the downstream barrier; and (ii) downstream flow-thinning at landing,
that reduces the lateral pressure acting on the downstream barrier.
Based on the physical model tests and numerical analyses, a new, quantitative scientific
framework and formulations for multiple-barrier systems are developed. This framework
accounts for (i) runup upon barrier impact; (ii) the trajectory of overflow; and (iii) landing
velocity attenuation which facilitates the optimization of multiple-barrier systems. These
interaction mechanisms have profound effects on downstream impact characteristics, when
the upstream barrier height is taller than twice the maximum flow depth. Thus, the
downstream barrier height and impact pressure can be reduced up to 17% and 35%,
respectively. Proper design of upstream barrier height and spacing between barriers can
avoid unnecessarily large impact pressures on the downstream barriers. These imply that
structural capacity for the downstream barriers can be safely reduced.
It is acknowledged that small-scale flume tests of dry sand flow entail scaling discrepancies
with the absence of pore fluid. If high-quality data from large scaled tests becomes
available, it would be worthwhile to utilise the data to enrich the proposed multiple-barrier
framework for enhancement of engineering applications in future.
Post a Comment