THESIS
2016
xiii, 178 pages : illustrations ; 30 cm
Abstract
Zhu Xi, as the great synthesizer of Neo-Confucianism, reformulated Han Yu’s concept of the
“transmission of the Way” (daotong) and designated Zhou Dunyi as the heir to this
transmission ever since Mencius. He assimilated Zhou’s concept of the “Great Ultimate” (taiji)
and through interpreting it as “principle” (li) from the perspective of metaphysics, gradually
developed a philosophical system which is both integrated and harmonious. On the formation
of this very system, Zhou definitely had significant impact.
However, existing scholarship treats the linkage between the thoughts of the two philosophers
mainly on the basis of the materials found in Zhu’s commentary on Zhou’s Taijitu Shuo. This
study will, therefore, attempt to examine also Zhu’s commentary on the Tongshu, as well...[
Read more ]
Zhu Xi, as the great synthesizer of Neo-Confucianism, reformulated Han Yu’s concept of the
“transmission of the Way” (daotong) and designated Zhou Dunyi as the heir to this
transmission ever since Mencius. He assimilated Zhou’s concept of the “Great Ultimate” (taiji)
and through interpreting it as “principle” (li) from the perspective of metaphysics, gradually
developed a philosophical system which is both integrated and harmonious. On the formation
of this very system, Zhou definitely had significant impact.
However, existing scholarship treats the linkage between the thoughts of the two philosophers
mainly on the basis of the materials found in Zhu’s commentary on Zhou’s Taijitu Shuo. This
study will, therefore, attempt to examine also Zhu’s commentary on the Tongshu, as well as
related materials kept in his Collected Essays and Classified Conversations, so as to trace the
process in which Zhu inherited and further developed Zhou’s thought.
Chapter 1 surveys the interactions and exchanges of ideas among Zhu and his contemporaries,
including his mentor Li Tong and his friends Lü Zuqian, Zhang Shi and the Lu brothers,
during or even before his applying himself to commenting on the Taijitu Shuo and the Tongshu.
Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 systematically analyze all the available sources as afore-mentioned
in order to investigate into Zhu’s reading of Zhou’s thought. It has been found that Zhu
interpreted the “Great Ultimate” as “principle” and considered them, together with sincerity
(cheng), as identical, despite their difference in name. He also sharply distinguished the
metaphysical “principle” of the “Great Ultimate” from the physical function of activity and
stillness. To him, the visions of the Taijitu Shuo and the Tongshu are consistent.
Chapter 4 examines Zhu’s readings of the Taijitu Shuo and the Tongshu through placing them
within the entire system of his classics’ interpretation, demonstrating the great emphasis he
put on “the principle that penetrates everything”. To Zhu, the “principle” of the “Great
Ultimate” runs through the whole process of studying and practicing, cultivating oneself and
governing the others, assuming and declining offices, advancing and withdrawing, expelling
heresies and modelling on sages and worthies, and manifests itself differently according to the
suitability of situations.
Chapter 5 searches within Zhu’s system the philosophical grounds on which he based his
reading of Zhou’s thought and accounts for such a reading through an examination of his life
and the intellectual atmosphere of his time. On the basis of these exercises, the author is of the
opinion that Zhu’s reading of Zhou’s thought is indeed legitimate.
Post a Comment