THESIS
2017
xiv, 116 pages : illustrations (some color) ; 30 cm
Abstract
Multiple lengths scale can affect materials’ behavior. Internal and intrinsic lengths such as grain
size, grain boundary thickness and phase transformation interface thickness along with external
lengths such as sample size are key lengths in shape memory alloys. This study aims to capture
the effects of altering such lengths on shape memory alloys phase transformation behavior.
Grain sizes ranging between 10 and 421 nm have been fabricated by severe cold rolling and
subsequent heat treatment of commercial grade near equiatomic superelastic NiTi sheets.
Macroscale pillars of 1 × 1 × 3 mm and microscale pillars with an aspect ratio of 1 to 3 and
diameters of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.5 μm were fabricated on each grain size and monotonically
compressed at room temperature by a UTM machine an...[
Read more ]
Multiple lengths scale can affect materials’ behavior. Internal and intrinsic lengths such as grain
size, grain boundary thickness and phase transformation interface thickness along with external
lengths such as sample size are key lengths in shape memory alloys. This study aims to capture
the effects of altering such lengths on shape memory alloys phase transformation behavior.
Grain sizes ranging between 10 and 421 nm have been fabricated by severe cold rolling and
subsequent heat treatment of commercial grade near equiatomic superelastic NiTi sheets.
Macroscale pillars of 1 × 1 × 3 mm and microscale pillars with an aspect ratio of 1 to 3 and
diameters of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.5 μm were fabricated on each grain size and monotonically
compressed at room temperature by a UTM machine and a flat tip diamond Nano indenter
respectively. The results show that hysteresis loop area and transformation strain of the
microscale pillars of 0.5 and 1.0 μm diameters vary non-monotonically with grain size, first
increasing and then decreasing. In contrast, hysteresis loop area and transformation strain
monotonically increase with grain size in macroscale pillars and microscale pillars of 2.5 μm
diameter. Analysis of the results reveals that the monotonic increasing trend is observed when
grain size is increased relative to grain boundary and phase transformation interface
thicknesses. This enhances the transformation inside the grains by promoting nucleation and
growth of martensite domains. The initial increasing trend observed in the non-monotonic
behavior of the pillars is also caused by the aforementioned mechanism, nevertheless, the
subsequent decreasing trend is observed once grain size becomes comparable with the sample
size. This would decrease the number of grains across the pillars’ diameter which owing to the
transformation behavior discrepancy between surface and interior grains, increases the
inhomogeneity of the pillars and suppresses the transformation.
Post a Comment