THESIS
2020
xi, 106 pages : illustrations (some color) ; 30 cm
Abstract
Signal transduction through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been a major focus in cell
biology for decades. It is widely believed that receptor activation triggers the dissociation of
heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαβγ) into two functional entities, Gα and Gβγ, for signaling. Gβγ
signaling has become increasingly popular owing to its diverse downstream effectors and thus
potential implications in numerous pathological disorders. Yet, the existence of receptor-induced
Gβγ signal has not been rigorously proven in all scenarios because its downstream effectors overlap
substantially with those regulated by the Gα subunit. Thus, in order to unambiguously observe Gβγ
signals from an activated receptor, the function of its counterpart, Gα, has to be eliminated first.
Given that Gβ...[
Read more ]
Signal transduction through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been a major focus in cell
biology for decades. It is widely believed that receptor activation triggers the dissociation of
heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαβγ) into two functional entities, Gα and Gβγ, for signaling. Gβγ
signaling has become increasingly popular owing to its diverse downstream effectors and thus
potential implications in numerous pathological disorders. Yet, the existence of receptor-induced
Gβγ signal has not been rigorously proven in all scenarios because its downstream effectors overlap
substantially with those regulated by the Gα subunit. Thus, in order to unambiguously observe Gβγ
signals from an activated receptor, the function of its counterpart, Gα, has to be eliminated first.
Given that Gβγ signals are frequently observed in a G
i-coupled system, this study aims to generate
a Gα
i1 mutant that loses its ability to inhibit adenylyl cyclase (AC), its cognate effector, but is otherwise fully functional. A series of Gα
i1 chimeras was generated by replacing its putative
effector-interacting domains with the homologous regions of Gα
t1. All Gα
i1/t1 chimeras failed to
eliminate the constitutive inhibition from Gα
i1QL, whereas the constitutive activity of Gα
i1RC was
abolished by some chimeras. Yet, these chimeras still retained the ability to inhibit AC upon
receptor activation. Dose-response analysis on Gα
i1QL and Gα
i1RC suggested a differential
inhibitory profile between the two commonly used constitutively active mutants. Besides, sequence
comparison between inhibitory Gα
i/z identified an RNK motif on the α4/β6 loop of Gα
z as a
potential determinant for AC inhibition. Asn-to-Arg mutation on this motif causes Gα
z to
constitutively inhibit AC and interact with Ric-8A more efficiently. Collectively, these results
indicated that the regions responsible for AC inhibition on Gα
i1 may be distinct from other members
of the G
i family. The AC interaction domains on different Gα
i/z subunits may have subtle
differences that have not yet been elucidated.
Post a Comment